Threat Risk Assessment – Make Sure to Review This In-Depth Peer Review in Relation to These Threat Assessments.

Perhaps, you are unaware however, there is a high level research division for future technologies assigned to the US Government intelligence agencies and industrial intelligence complex. It’s called IARPA in fact it is an ingenious concept based on the DARPA model; High-risk – High Gain method of advanced research and development. Which enables sense right, especially considering we are living in a world fraught with cyber hackers, corporate espionage, and terrorists. This means our intelligence agencies must be on your ball, and they have to be right 100% of the time while the evil-doers only have to obtain it right once you discover.

Now then, consider if you will the massive volume of data our company is collecting on individual citizens nowadays online. In addition to that, but everyone presently has a brilliant phone, an e-mail address, and perhaps a number of social network sites pages. Folks also make comments on articles they read within the media into little boxes and press the submit button. As it is quite easy to understand who someone is based on their ISP address, their social networking profile, their cellular phone number, and exactly how they write – it is quite easy to do security threat analysis to see if they may be a threat risk.

Today, the artificial intelligent computers which collect all of this data have not been optimized or programmed all of that well, and therefore these are flagging too many false positives. However every time someone gets away with a crime against humanity, a terrorist act, a hacking event, a criminal act, and even spying the authorities could go back and look at their types of operation, their writings, and gain clues into the human psyche that goes in addition to such folks. And every time the artificial intelligent computers get better at guesstimating in just a close tolerance of probability the kind of individuals they are looking for – the better they will work. If you were IARPA wouldn’t you be looking into this?

Okay so, since this has all but happening quite a very long time it makes sense these particular artificial intelligent computers are obtaining rather proficient at the Lone Wolf assessment (Lone Wolf may be someone such as the Unabomber as an illustration). Think about the lone wolf as being the hardest form of terrorist to get, someone who works alone, has minimal communication with all the outside world, detailed plans that happen to be never distributed to anyone, and for that reason few clues to offer them away, or few associates, Facebook friends, or collaborators to change them in. Therefore it is very difficult to end up in their brains and discover what they’re thinking without contacting them within the auspice of some important reason besides the particular surveillance.

Quite simply it requires manpower, and a very good story to even get to a point to speak to this sort of individual. However because most people are connected now and everybody is able to be geo-tracked, and has an e-mail address, or possibly a Facebook page there are lots of strategies to speak to these individuals. One problem with the is manpower. Therefore it’s obvious that in the future artificial intelligent computers, true artificial intelligence according to Alan Turing’s famous AI test (the capability of any computer to fool a human into thinking that it is actually conversing with another human) – will contact these folks and start up some form of conversation.

The easiest method to do this is for the artificial intelligent computer to search through all the data, including every one of the writings that seemed to be posted in forums, responding to online media articles, and all of the postings on blogs, and social networking pages. From there the artificial intelligent computer can make use of the individual’s own words, and modify those sentences using similar words using the same meaning from your thesaurus, in the database of the AI software application – and that AI computer are able to talk to the individual over a one-on-one basis.

In doing so, the AI computer will be gathering information from that conversation along with something that the average person types way back in an e-mail. All of that could then be loaded into a database and added to all of the collected words already written, or spoken right into a cellular phone, given that the intelligence agencies have received the legal right to listen in. Needless to say, all of the public information will not likely need to have a permission slip or court subpoena. It really is quite entirely possible that eventually these AI systems can correspond together with the individual every so often, checking in on the psychological displacement, or progress, further assessing in case they have increased the potential likelihood of committing a violent act, or maybe if that individual will likely be downgraded to an alternative level.

As soon as the individual grows to the upper level, and it would appear that they are either willing or prepared to commit this type of act, that’s when human intervention may take place, and merely if they become a menace to society or our government inside a strong probability, mathematically speaking. After a while better algorithms will be used and thru practice better techniques is going to be learned to make certain there are actually very few false positives. Now then, I will hear the EFF – Electronic Freedom Foundation already to submit a lawsuit against the application of these AI computers in this connection.

Probably the ethical question is going to be does the us government and our intelligence agencies have the authority to snoop on citizens, pretend to be someone they are not, collect specifics of each potential individual, and stick that in a file somewhere, or tucked away in certain giant data center? The reality is that if someone posts information online within the public, that information and facts are now inside the public, and anyone may apply it any legitimate purpose.

Protecting the American people is within the world of the government’s responsibility according to the United states Constitution along with a legitimate purpose you could argue prior to the Supreme Court. Thus, they could have the right to gather all of the public facts about any individual which happens to be on the net. Not merely will they actually do this for American citizens, and also from potential threats of international terrorism, and people away from our country. Surely, our intelligence services and agencies will probably be working together with other governments around the world sharing this data.

Who is to mention that other governments will not be already collecting info on Americans? It would behoove them to get this done regardless of whether they didn’t find any Americans were a menace to their countries or nations, for that simple reason to market us much more of their items which has been imported to the us. Corporations collect your information at all times because perhaps you are a consumer, you might have joined their rewards program, or you have already been known as someone that may potentially purchase something from their store down the road. They are doing have the legal right to collect information they find online.

Let’s say somebody who is upset with something occurring on the planet writes rather disparaging comments about some agency, company, industry, or individual in the Washington Post website after articles they just read – that information will probably be collected, and therefore the AI computer may contact that individual under false pretense, and try to set up a conversation. If it conversation leads the AI computer to think that the individual is problematic, psychotic, extremely angry, or willing to take action into their own hands, then your threat assessment level goes up, and red flags will probably be raised.

Remember, I found myself discussing the difficulties of manpower within the intelligence industry and intelligence agencies. It is a real dilemma, for whenever we have way too many false positives and spend a lot of time and money about the wrong individuals, our company is prone to let other people slip through. However, if the artificial intelligent computer has gotten seccurity the purpose it may pass the Turing test without tipping off the individual, it might in simple terms have conversations by e-mail with hundreds and hundreds of people in one afternoon.

Since this will be possible or perhaps, already is, it will likely be part of our future, our government, and other governments, and folks uses these techniques, them all plus some more We have not discussed in this article. Okay so, I suppose you will be wondering how come I know this? No comment. Indeed, I hope you’ve enjoyed today’s technology briefing and appreciate all of your afternoon, I know I will, and don’t forget to get more info about you online at your social network. Ha ha ha. Please consider this all and think onto it.